Skip to main content

Investing in international equities: Why look abroad?

May 29, 2025

International equities have broken a long stretch of underperformance versus U.S. equities in the first half of 2025. U.S. equities are slightly positive year to date as of May 28 according to the S&P 500 Index, while international equities are up about 15% using the MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index as a reference.

That performance difference is made more remarkable by the fact that international equities remain considerably less expensive than their U.S peers on a price-to-earnings basis—only slightly narrowing a valuation gap that has been widening for most of the last decade.

Exhibit 1: International equities are less expensive than their U.S. peers, but are they a bargain?

Chart
Source: FactSet. Data shown for period from 1/29/2016 to 5/23/2025.

Over the past ten years, investors have grown accustomed to U.S. primacy in equity markets as international equities trailed the U.S. by 7.5% annualized during the period.1 The diversification benefit of investing abroad for U.S. investors has also seemed to diminish over time. Exhibit 2 shows the correlation between the S&P 500 and MSCI ACWI ex-USA.2 This longer-term trend suggests that overseas equities have moved more in tandem with U.S. equities, potentially lowering their value as a portfolio diversifier.

Exhibit 2: A questionable portfolio diversifier for U.S. investors
Rolling one-year correlation between the S&P 500 and MSCI ACWI ex-USA

Chart
Source: FactSet. Data shown for period from 1/29/1988 to 3/31/2025.Trailing one-year periods as of each month end.

Based on the performance reversal during the first half of 2025 and questions about their portfolio diversification benefit, should investors think about international equity markets in a different light?

We believe international equities deserve a place within the long-term strategic allocations of most equity investors. However, we caution against investing passively in an index. Instead, we believe investing abroad should be done at a fundamental level where the emphasis is on finding fund managers whose process leads to companies that offer four key features: 

  1. earnings growth comparable to levels found in the U.S.
  2. quality-like attributes, such as above-average returns on equity and attractive reinvestment opportunities 
  3. unique, durable sources of demand responsible for earnings growth
  4. reasonable valuations

How can profitability help explain the difference between U.S. and international equities?

Return on equity (ROE) shows how well a company (or index) uses resources to generate income. We believe that an investor’s return over time will likely look similar to that company’s (or index’s) ROE, assuming a change in the company’s valuation doesn’t distort the relationship by growing more or less expensive during the timeframe. In technical terms, ROE measures the financial performance of a stock by dividing its net income by shareholders' equity. Simply put, ROE can be a helpful indicator for determining potential performance.

With that in mind, exhibit 3 compares the trailing twelve-month ROE of the S&P 500 Index with the MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index since January of 2016.

Exhibit 3: U.S. stocks outperformed overseas stocks
Return on equity for S&P 500 and MSCI ACWI ex-USA

Chart
Source: FactSet, as of 3/31/2025. Return on equity shown on a trailing last 12-month basis.

On average over the decade through March of 2025, the ROE for the S&P 500 was 16%, and its annualized return was 12.5%.3 For the MSCI ACWI ex-USA, its average ROE for that time period was 11% while its annualized return was 5%.4

All of this is to say that, in general, the S&P 500 and the MSCI ACWI ex-USA have largely earned their returns, meaning that their corporate earnings have justified these indexes’ respective performances. U.S. companies have outperformed their offshore peers, and we believe the difference in performance between the two indexes can be attributed to the differences in ROE. It is the persistently lower ROE of the international index that leads us to shy away from investing at an index level in overseas markets.

But are there diamonds in the rough?
Amongst the 1,800-plus companies in the MSCI ACWI ex-USA, might there be companies worth owning? Are there companies potentially capable of generating ROEs like what we find in the U.S.?

To answer these questions, we added a third line to exhibit 4 which shows the ROE of the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. It’s composed of companies that have demonstrated high ROEs, low leverage ratios5 and consistency in earnings. The selected 300 or so companies were then weighted to match the sector allocations of the MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index.

Exhibit 4: Overseas quality stocks look similar to their U.S. peers
Return on equity for S&P 500, MSCI ACWI ex-USA and MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index

Chart
Source: FactSet as of 3/31/2025. Return on equity shown on a trailing last 12-month basis.

It is striking to see the improved ROE for international equities with an added quality factor and how closely it aligns to that of the S&P 500.

We believe exhibit 4 shows that international equity markets shouldn’t be disregarded entirely as there appear to be some companies whose ROE can transcend borders and match their U.S. peers.

Active investing may succeed in uncovering quality equities

We believe active management can add incremental value in international markets above that of passive quality because implementing a standardized screening tool for finding quality companies can be difficult. There are several reasons that support this belief:

  1. The forward outlook for a company’s ROE may differ meaningfully from its history.
  2. There are companies with quality potential but whose current metrics don’t suggest they are quality stocks.
  3. Not all equities with leverage are low quality.
  4. It is difficult to “systematize” the quality of a firm’s management team and its ability to efficiently invest across their entire business.

Lastly, there’s no great need to align portfolios with the same sector allocations as the MSCI ACWI ex-USA. Again, we believe the opportunity to invest with a fund manager is only compelling when we see the potential to gain exposure to companies that possess the four features we described at the outset.  

As a result, we believe it can be worth taking on greater portfolio concentration and deviations versus the MSCI ACWI ex-USA index. Like stock selection, sector allocation and position sizing decisions that deviate from the index represent active investment choices that may potentially add value to investment performance over time.

 

 

 

1. Source: FactSet, 10 years ending 3/31/2025. U.S. equities represented by the S&P 500 Index and international equities represented by MSCI ACWI ex-USA Index.
2. Source: FactSet. Data covers the period from 1/29/1988 to 3/31/2025.Trailing one-year periods as of each month end.
3. Source: FactSet, as of 3/31/25.
4. Source: FactSet, as of 3/31/25.
5. A low leverage ratio suggests that a company may be more likely to meet its financial obligations.

Key Takeaways

Important Disclosure

This communication is intended solely to provide general information. The information and opinions stated may change without notice. The information and opinions do not represent a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any market, industry, sector or security. Statements of fact have been obtained from sources deemed reliable, but no representation is made as to their completeness or accuracy. The opinions expressed are not intended as individual investment, tax or estate planning advice or as a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Please consult your personal advisor to determine whether this information may be appropriate for you. This information is provided solely for insight into our general management philosophy and process. Historical performance does not guarantee future results and results may differ over future time periods.


IRS Circular 230 Notice: Pursuant to relevant U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. You should seek advice based on your particular circumstances from your tax advisor.

Additional important disclosures 

Related Insights

Talk to Us Today

Let us review your current situation and show you how we can empower you to reach your financial goals.